Wednesday, November 15, 2023 6:49:55 PM
I don't. I am currently putting a 75% probability on the seniors being eventually exchanged for commons. AIG and Calabria's book show that not only should that probability not be zero, it should exceed 50% (using Bayesian priors) given the lack of contrary data points.
A pretty vague statement. There is a lot of room between "exactly like AIG" and "not at all like AIG", and everything but the most extreme end of the latter can truthfully be called "uncharted territory".
Naturally.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything, in case you were wondering. I continue this discussion for my benefit and for that of those who have thanked me in the past for my posts.
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Engages Olayinka Oyebola & Co for Two-Year Audit • GRLF • May 28, 2024 8:30 AM
HealthLynked Introduces AI-Powered Chat Function to Enhance Healthcare Accessibility • HLYK • May 28, 2024 8:00 AM
Avant Technologies Engages Wired4Tech to Evaluate the Performance of Next Generation AI Server Technology • AVAI • May 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM