Here's more ridiculousness that shareholders are asked to swallow... Oh man...
Hudnell is supposed to be this super lawyer...but I find it extremely fishy that:
On his website front page, he lists his top accomplishments. 4 out of the top 5 are listed as vplm accomplishments... So that is his main claim to fame.....that in the years since he came on board, he has managed to see the pps go down HOW MUCH?? I'll have to do some research on that to see just how much it fell on his watch.
His #1 listed accomplishment is he get a favorable settlement from Amazon for vplm. That is even tho there is no evidence of any settlement so far and has only caused the price drop CONSIDERABLY since the alleged settlement... And while it's good enough for a "super lawyer" to list this as his numero uno accomplishment of his career, it's apparently not good in terms of a material event to be be noted, as required, within around 4 days, in the form of an 8k.......AND/OR...........the 3rd quarter 10k even tho the announcement of the settlement 1st came on 5/2 and even if you add the 45 days for finalization, that's still only mid June, while the 3rd quarter report was on 8/16 or thereabouts. And again, price dropped ever since his NUMBER 1 LISTED (by himself) career accomplishment... Something seems very OFF there to me. It reminds me of djt constantly touting that he was the best prez of all time.
The other 3 accomplishments of the 4 out of top 5 are all claiming he was responsible for a bunch of IPR favorable decisions. To me, that's a load of crap because the patents were valid to begin with DUE TO THE UNMATCHED WISDOM, EXPERTISE AND PROFESSIONALISM of the USPTO, then the various challenges to the patents and the PTAB, who never have a negative decision on a whole slew of challenges to the patents ever since ol Tom Sawyer threatened them with Federal RICO charges, having sent the letters to the potus, the scotus, and all of congress, and governors. But not only that (and that's a pretty damn big "that"), the challengers
FAILED to bring forth any valid challenges to validity, therefore, vplm gained nothing they didn't already have.....ON THEIR OWN ALREADY PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED MERITS. So, in other words, vplm's patents DEFENDED THEMSELVES SIMPLY BY THE VERY NATURE OF THERE ALREADY EXISTING VALIDITIES!!! So they didn't even need hudnell as the patents defended themselves upon THEIR OWN RIGHT.
Did I mention that since hudnell came on board, the price has tanked and all we get is phantom settlement and zero benefit. Yay Hudnell....way to go man!
All my commentary is to be considered as my personal opinions, to which I am entitled. And there is no proof of said opinions unless I offer it in the comments.
AI
