Our negotiator stresses the stark difference between DeMarco and Sandra Thompson, as a new line of attack to the Fanniegate scandal.
The approach is to highlight the intent with their actions.
DeMarco, with the strict compliance with the law, although you may think that he succumbed to the CRT, barred in the Charter's credit enhancement clause, it's assumed that it's another way to hold their capital in escrow at the Treasury Department, because this "fee or charge" is also barred in the Charter's Fee Limitation. Thus, complying with the conservator's Rehab power, and the concealment is another way to misrepresent their financial condition.
On the other hand, the Goldman Sachs alumni Sandra Thompson, who even the timing of her arrival to the FHFA was ill intent and failed, attempting to distance herself from the NWS dividend (she didn't know that the dividend is paid at the end of the next quarter), to later use it as a legal defense strategy in court: "DeMarco is to blame", in one of the lawsuits brought by her Hedge Funds guard that adores her: at the FDIC, she spearheaded the multiple Public-Private Partnerships with Wall Street in the 1989 RTC scheme using the FHLBanks, that saddled the taxpayer with an estimated $48.8 billion loss. DeMarco was the auditor at GAO.
Their intent says it all:
DeMarco is helping out to some extent, playing both ways: a separate account plan that upholds the law and misleading about it.
Sandra Thompson is ready for the coup the grâce.
