Hmm. I find your concerns about being prosecuted for recording the conversation hard to digest. Tell me, what's the difference between you recording it and your having kept a record of the contents of the call, the one that you're reciting here:
"There is nothing planned at the moments But it may be brought back in the very near future, Howeve things are changing all the time and with the world in turmoil Red Alert is concentrating on more important requirements. When an if Tautachrome is re-launched a press release will be issued.
Thank you for calling, please do not call again !!"
Although your pseudo transcript would be viewed as anecdotal (as opposed to a word-for-word rendering of a two-person conversation), if recording the call without the other party's knowledge renders you liable to prosecution, doesn't publishing the contents here also expose you to the risk of libel, if they decide to refute that any call ever took place, or that you made up anything you've stated was said?
In any event, it seems like it was a very short call and if the other party (job role unmentioned, again a pity as it could have been the janitor for all we know, or indeed, for all you know, i.e. you should know exactly who you spoke to name/job role/position) did utter the words "please do not call again", they are devoid of a few brain cells to rub together. That's because politely telling you to go forth and multiply, doesn't prevent a deluge of further calls from persons other than yourself and if I were still a shareholder, I'd make sure we flood their line now with calls asking the same questions. Better still, get a local reporter on the job. They're always looking for something to grub around in lol.
Conclusion, let's be real, a bona fide company would never say to a concerned shareholder calling to enquire where their investment is headed "please do not call again". That's something we say to spam callers who've gotten our number from the internet. Ballsey though it was to call them, I think had it been me, I'd have recorded it and then told them at the end that I had made such a recording and that I'd be sending them a copy. Were they to complain about this, I'd offer to delete the recording (having taken a full and accurate transcript). <----- (hint to anyone thinking of replicating your initiative)
The rest of your conclusions I agree with, hence my undertone of sarcasm re the Financial Wiz Kid that prepared the fins (not) and the fact that non-disclosing promotion and fluff 8K's have been the lifeblood of the insiders that made money trading the spikes on this con job.
