”Seriously, you have been pretty negative on this company ever since it took over dwcm"
I surely have.
"What do you know that we do'nt?"
Nuttin'. I just reach different conclusions to you,even though I observe the same things that everybody else observes.
That's because I start from a different perspective, and with a different background.
You came to HDVY through the hope that you could make lots of money on the foot of a plausible high-tech story, involving technology and techniques that you don't understand but that sounded good.
I came to HDVY because I study scam stocks, and I noticed that HDVY was being pumped hard - very hard- by folk who had been associated with several companies that at best had a serious contempt for their shareholders, and at worst were plainly scams.
So I had a close look at HDVY and saw a number of things that looked like red flags to me.
The first is a classic high-tech company scam technique - claim that you have exclusive patented technology that no one else can use. Trouble is, if you never seriously enforce your IP rights (and HDVY's one case was actually against a friendly company, and for a derisory amount!) then it becomes clear that your IP is worth as much as you spend defending it - in HDVY's case, nothing.
And the story that someone has to infringe before that IP is enforceable is a crock. Firstly according to Barnhill himself, mega corporations like Microsoft are already in breach of HDVY's patents, but with complete impunity. Plus no other company should have FTO (freedom to operate)in the area of HDVY's patents, and HDVY could claim serious damages for that - if they genuinely have a case. They obviously don't think they have such a case.
Secondly I have (somewhat dated) post-grad level math, and the claims about the nature of SVMs by some of HDVY's more persistent touts were always ludicrous, and betrayed a level of ignorance stunning even by the high standards set by some of these pumpers in their previous assignments.
In a nutshell, I discount the value of HDVY's IP completely.
Thirdly, the usual reliance on avoiding buyer's remorse has been played by the pumpers and management here - "just hold your shares, like I am, and everything will be just fine", they tell you. Some management apologist are particularly fond of this technique, but I doubt they've ever bought a single share. (They may ofcourse have been given some, like most of HDVY's "consultants" seem to have been.)
For how many years have you heard that story - you personally? Why believe it now?
Fourthly, the appalling way this "management" treats its shareholders while stuffing its own snout firmly into the trough is nothing short of breathtaking.
Tonight's windfall for Tobin was only the latest example of many of Barnhill and his cronies' belief that you shareholders are nothing but ATMs, and dumb unquestioning ones at that, for them to draw down large sums of cash whenever they want - while the pps continues to go to hell in a handbasket for all they care.
Fifthly, when your principal investigator, Dr. Fritsche, is also your lead spokesperson, the Chair of your SAB and lands a cushy executive role after retiring from academia (assuming he did retire rather than Grassley getting to him first) then you have to wonder if his results will be reproducible in the hands of other investigators. Certainly he has always been highly conflicted.
"What happened or what did barnhill do in the past that rubbed you the wrong way??? "
Nothing happened - he just happens to be CEO of a company that I think is a (reasonably plausible) scam.
Hope this helps. GLTY.“
Bearish
“What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so.”
