Wow. It's absolutely uncanny.....you've done it again, apparently contradicting yourself and from reading your post, it seems you just don't realize you're doing it. This time you open by saying you really don't know what I'm trying to say and then you write a post that reflects that you DO understand what I said and you try to refute. But your getting things wrong. It seems to be a combination of not reading what's said carefully enough and not understanding some..
I did not say or imply anything you said was not honest. Saying it's a waste of time for me to send my concerns to Hudnell is wrong because I purposely did not directly send anything to Hudnell. It would be easy to do that if that's what I wanted to do. I simply made an open post here directed at him. I have reasons to believe he reads this board and even if he didn't, I believe the msg would get to him. And even if it did not make it to him, is besides the point.. The point is it's become for shareholders, in my humble opinion, to become a little proactive about what is going, esp as their value and monies are slipping away fast right before their eyes and in no time, it could be to damn late to do much about it. I have seen and personally experienced all this before, big time, and see everyone lose everything and managers get fined and go to jail after years of promises and lots of pollyanna support by those who think they are so smart enough to know what's going on. I've seen it happen with a company that was around for near 50 years and had a beloved CEO who was the CEO for decades. There were even govt reports that backed up the claims of that company. It was a saga that goes beyond the infamous vplm story. And I was involved for 5 yrs. It could easily have made 2 or 3 hit movies.
Back to the point of my post. For one thing, it was my way of expressing myself and how I think numerous others feel as well. I called for a PR to be put out where Hudnell could add or be quoted with the opportunity to say something about what I called for. I don't think that would be prohibitive. More and more shareholders have been getting quite antsy about the developments, esp the insider selling and at some point when enough peeps voice their incredulity and anger, more and more pressure is put upon the company. As I spelled out, I have zero interest in complaining to or send questions/concerns to the Emu or the IR as I have zero trust or faith in them plus anything they have to say is so subjective and biased and ambiguous and non specific, that it cannot be taken seriously and has little to no value afaic. If the msg got thru to Hudnell and if he's a good honest man, he could give some sort of response if he saw fit. But I am not really expecting or counting on that. More so, I just wanted to say my piece and put it out there. I hope it might be a catalyst for others to follow thru on and also voice their concerns and outrage at what's happening and to direct it to Hudnell because if I'm right that Emu and the IR and wife, et al, are not interested in the best interests of the shareholders, then point concerns to them is what the real waste of time is. But assuming that Hudnell is not a party to any hanky panky and if he cannot in his own thinking, justify the massive selling off and the lack of info and the failures to file necessary reports, etc, then maybe he would also see the need to do something about it because if he didn't even so much as recognize any of it, then that makes him somewhat suspect as well.
So my post was intended to express one shareholders outrage and hoping it would spur on more to do the same and if nothing else, maybe to embarrass Hudnell a tad, into maybe having so thing to say, attached to a PR. Of course, if that were allowed to happen, whatever Hudnell might say, of course would have to be in support of vplm. And if he said anything publicly in support, while at the same time, knowing that things that are happening are not quite right, well then again, it puts pressure on vplm to put out something and whatever they put out, if they do, we the shareholders can use to help discern it everything is on the up and up.
I'm speaking up cause I dint like what I see and I'm encouraging others to put some pressure on the comoany. If you think it's better to send an email direct to Hudnell, that's fine. I just chose to do it my own way. And I know my post was no waste of time.
winorloseitsyourstochoose
All my commentary is to be considered as my personal opinions, to which I am entitled. And there is no proof of said opinions unless I offer it in the comments.
