1st off, I just noticed that I didn't finish one of my comments. I noted about Emu, after quitting on both his trials on day 1 after promising to see them thru, that later he said he had evidence of computer tampering by Cameron. What I missed saying is that he never presented that evidence. He's a bullshitter.
As to answering my questions, I took a look at the questions I posed in last post and the answer is no, don't see those answered. What I do see is it appears to me that you backpedaled. It was originally, as framed by you, about the integrity of lord Emu. But after I gave a partial history that to me, impunes that integrity, seems you changed your narrative away from malak and made it more about whether or not vplm gets a win, regardless of anything else. So that sent the exchange off the track. I can't argue that a win isn't a win if they win. Of course it is and if it drove the price up high enough, I wouldn't care how the win was achieved because it would mean more money for me as a shareholder. You also said we had different definitions of a scam. That's confusing to me. A scam is a scam. It's a dishonest business that works to enrich itself at the expense of its customers.
Look, I've stated before that until recently, over the years I always avoided using the term scam. That was because wasn't perfectly sure that it was a planned scam and reserved the possibility that maybe it swerved or slid from an honest company into becoming rogue or that there mightve been misunderstanding by the some or all of the BOD where they believed the patents were all that and didn't know they really were not in practice or a host of other possible scenarios that I could fathom. But after a certain number of things occurred that I found to be very wrong and very non fiduciary and dots beginning to not connect in terms of an up and up company, more and more I saw ever increasing possibilities that became probabilities and kept adding up to the point where I could no longer accept the idea of vplm being an honest company that put it's shareholders 1st. But more than anything else, far more than anything else is the main reasons I have settled on for years now about how it makes zero sense that if the patents were what we were told they were, and had the insane kind of value that was spelled out and the power of owning such a powerful control over the too form of communications the world has ever seen.....that no one would ever buy, license, settle or partner with vplm. I've heard the very few totally lame explanations for that and they are weaker than weak. I have posed all sorts of questions that if answered, would show that the patents couldn't possibly be all that and have all that power and value and not be desired by any voip companies. That's what I center on, period because I know it's against human nature as well as business nature. And that's why no one can ever answer the questions when I throw them out there as any answer would blow the cover of believability. All the claims vplm made about the parents have never been proven or substantiate or demonstrated. They just have SAID they have. A lie. Another big thing is all the blatant unmistakable lies they have told for many years. I delineated all the details before, and posted the documents. That's how I've been able to successfully predict what would happen or not happen for many years now and almost be shown to be right, while the majority of those on the pro side have been predicting things that never ever come to pass for many hears years. Everytime I say watch out for incoming monkey wrenches, they come. So the bottom line is I believe the patents are not Ll that BY INFERENCE. And I have seen the factual evidence that lord Emu has turned this circus into a personal insider ATM. NO BOUT-A-DOUBT-IT!
All my commentary is to be considered as my personal opinions, to which I am entitled. And there is no proof of said opinions unless I offer it in the comments.
