InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 32
Posts 3452
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/30/2015

Re: logic-commonsense post# 150027

Tuesday, 10/31/2023 4:36:47 PM

Tuesday, October 31, 2023 4:36:47 PM

Post# of 171868
What did I twist? I am discussing the actual words and phrasing George used as opposed to the pumper clowns automatically turning them into merger! merger! merger!

Last I heard, acquiring a single asset of a company does not refer to a merger of the entire company. Unless perhaps it is referring to the control block, as I acquiesce. But then why not just say an acquisition of the company? Why be cryptic?

Or perhaps he is to be taken literally. It is simply a single asset being bought, whatever that might mean. Heck, in theory it could mean just a single bitcoin mining machine. I am using that as an example only, don't get your panties in a bunch and claim that I am claiming that is all the acquisition is.

Still not entirely sure if it's the company doing the buying or the selling of the asset. "An asset of the company" seems to refer to present tense, as if the asset in discussion to be acquired is already part of GVSI, so it is being sold. Otherwise shouldn't it read something more like "an acquisition of an asset for the Company" or "an acquisition of an asset to be a part of the Company"?

One does have to wonder why George doesn't just explicitly spell it out without all the room for multiple interpretations. Which obviously all point to merger! merger! merger! in OTC pumper fantasy land.