Good Vibrations Shoes Inc (GVSI)

[Jayman5000]

There is a significant difference between "acquiring" the entire company and "acquiring" a single asset of the company.

The court document specifically said an asset of the company.

It was even written so lovingly vague that it could easily be more rightly interpreted as someone else acquiring an asset from GVSI instead of GVSI doing the acquiring.

Mind you, if that actually refers to the control block of shares being acquired by someone else, then that is one thing, and yes - that would make sense for a merger being game on.

However, a nitpicker might point out that the control block is not an asset of the company - the control block currently belongs to George. It's an asset of his, not an asset of the company. Or is that just semantics?

Obviously you pumper clowns will do everything you can to try to twist anything into the most awesomest amazingest mergeriest thing ever, no matter what language George actually used and counting on the naive to just go with it, not knowing better.