On November 4, 2021, a lawsuit captioned CAMRON ELIZABETH v. MARK PALUMBO et al., Case No. CVPS2106116 was filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Riverside against the Company and certain of the former company’s (CannAssist International Corp.) executive officers (collectively, the “Defendants”). The Plaintiff and the former company (CannAssist International Corp.) entered into a Consulting Agreement dated November 20, 2020 (the “Consulting Agreement”), pursuant to which Plaintiff was engaged to provide certain sales and marketing services to that Company. As a condition of this Consulting Agreement, Plaintiff was paid a monthly fee and was granted restricted shares of the common stock of the former company that were subject to certain vesting conditions tied to Plaintiff’s service under the Consulting Agreement. The Consulting Agreement also contained provisions that enabled the former company to terminate the Consulting Agreement without cause after 10 days’ written notice. In September 2021, the former company exercised its right to terminate the Consulting Agreement because management of the former company at the time of termination was dissatisfied with the quality of Plaintiff’s services under the Consulting Agreement. Specifically, management of the former company at the time of termination received complaints from third parties that Plaintiff behaved inappropriately in meetings where Plaintiff made presentations to potential clients and vendors on behalf of the former company. In contrast, Plaintiff alleges, among other things, that the Defendants improperly misclassified Plaintiff as an independent contractor, that certain of the former company’s executive officers committed sexual harassment and defamation and that Defendants unlawfully terminated Plaintiff. A jury trial has been set for October 27, 2023. The Company believes it should not be a party to the lawsuit since the former company, including its operations, officers, employees, contractors, assets, and liabilities were all spun out as part of or as a result of the Spin Out Agreement dated July 23, 2021, and the Plaintiff never contracted with or was employed by the current Company. Accordingly, the Company has a motion to dismiss certain misclassification claims set for hearing on September 11, 2023. The Company believes that the lawsuit is without merit and intends to defend the lawsuit vigorously; however, there can be no assurance regarding the ultimate outcome of this lawsuit.
Other than as described above, we know of no other material, existing or pending legal proceedings against the Company, nor is it involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation. Other than as described above, we know of no other proceedings in which our directors, officers or any affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.
