Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

The issue wasn't whether you said you couldn't or wasn't sure and I never tried to make that a issue. The issue as I made clear from the get, was about you saying some court document info was privy to you and maybe not to others. I didn't understand how that would be so and so I questioned you about it. You also suggested I should go to the trouble and expense of hiring a Texas lawyer to get said info. So I did my own research, something that I've done a massive amount of on vplm amongst other stick issues, for the past 13 yrs or so and have said so here from and demonstrated it here with many documents and laws and definitions, etc. etc. Anyone that has read much of this board would know that. Even today I posted legal DD here. And yet you now are, lol, claiming to have taught me how to do research. That's funny of you to say. You haven't taught me anything, but if it makes feel important to say that, that's ok. And your claim that I was relying on you for research is pretty funny. I like jokes.

So as was saying, after I found your privy claim to be questionable, I did the research, as I always instinctively do and found there was absolutely no validity to what you said. I know you're backpedaling now and will twist and turn it, but that is what went down. There is no such "privy" or privacy issue as you tried to claim might be the case. And you didn't sound as tho you were aware but unless you ordered more than $30 worth of docs from Pacer at a dime apiece, in a quarter, then the docs were free, so no excuse there and if you did happen to wind up paying for whatever docs you were originally referring to, most likely it was under a dollar or so and regardless of that, the research shows that those docs are constitutionally public with no copyright so no reason whatsoever, contrary to what you were trying to feed me, that you could not have shared what you stated might not be shareable. And there is no such thing as court docs that only you are "privy to".

Thus, once again, my instincts and common sense turned out to be right when I had a slight problem with what you originally claimed. The posts are there to see and support what I just said. So now you can:

I'm no legal scholar but I certainly know how to do research and have been doing since long before the internet. I have a large database of research on vplm and patent laws, etc. IMHO, you tried to be a little bit elitist in your claim to have stuff for your eyes only. That's how it came off anyway. No biggie. It's all good. You had your say and I had mine and now we can move on, right?