You said that court docs or certain ones, we're open to you but not to the public. I asked what would be open to you but not the public. Your reply was Texas court information. I asked why and you said you were paying for the docs and they might not be open to the public or something close to that. With ZG's info and now my own research, I see that in general, all trials, civil or criminal are open to the public with some few exceptions and that the courts proceedings are also open to the public via Pacer and the fees are small and are waved if the requests are under a certain amount. Therefore, unless I misunderstood you, I think I should take exception to you telling me that what you had been referencing was not available to the public and that perhaps I should hire a lawyer to be able to access the courts info. Sorry if I misunderstood but thats how it came across to me.
Now, I don't yet know if the court documents that are accessed via pacer are ok to copy/paste here but I'm guessing they are since they are indeed public information. I'll check into that further. But if it's ok, and the docs are free or very inexpensive, I don't see why they aren't shared more than they are, generally speaking.
As to trial proceedings, I don't think I said anything about that, but rather just questioned you on what you said. It doesn't matter if it's non trial proceedings or trials when they occur, it's about the ongoing progress of court proceedings in the vplm cases, is all.
Therefore, if a case is dismissed and I understand several already have been, my assumption is that the reason for dismissal ought to be read from the court minutes or summaries or whatever it is that we can access publicly. And yet, there seems to be a lack of understanding and/or confusion as to certain aspects of those settlements. Add to that, the fact that I see any sort of settlement as a definite material event, yet at least in the case of the alleged Amazon settlement, there have been to my knowledge, no SEC filings so far, such as 10q or 8k and I don't understand why. I'd like to know why. I think there was possibly enough time to have filed that info in the 2nd quarter filing but if not, my understanding is the requirement is for an 8k to be filed (I think it's an 8k) within 4 days, but that didn't happen either to my knowledge. I find all this to be pretty fishy, but not at all surprising.
All my commentary is to be considered as my personal opinions, to which I am entitled. And there is no proof of said opinions unless I offer it in the comments.
