Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[rapz]

VPLM's MG patent lawsuit, our first case, already settled in Waco. A settlement discussion was held for 45 days and completed. Some sort of a non-disclosure agreement prevents VPLM from revealing the monetary settlement amount. They are tight-lipped because perhaps they still have the 606 RBR patent lawsuit pending, without the stay that AMZN requested.

VPLM is also tight-lipped about their discussions with APPL and T.

TMUS and VZ are trying to avoid a trial with pre-trial moves and playing hide and seek with their expert witnesses. A jury trial will be nice, so that the jury can find them guilty of willful infringements.

Judge Albright holds the key.

In the meanwhile, VPLM Dr. Cabric sent a powerful re-exam response to USPTO regarding 606 RBR patent. All share holders on the email list got a copy of this document. Highlights:
8 new claims have been added for a total of 57 claims,
3 main claims still hold strong and are unchanged.
VLNC's Dr. Cabric asserts that the patent examiner has made errors by assuming that the network combinations cited in prior art, as proposed by Mermel, Bedingfield, Dr. Min and Koch are valid. These combinations are not workable. They fail. Dr. Cabric, asserts [b]invalidity of network combinations cited in the prior art, they fail and not workable. If Dr. Cabric succeeds in proving the invalid network combinations as proposed in the prior art, there will be no more issue of Alice or obviousness argument in NDCal or elsewhere with regard to RBR patents. jmo