InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 2889
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/25/2020

Re: navycmdr post# 770430

Tuesday, 10/10/2023 3:07:58 AM

Tuesday, October 10, 2023 3:07:58 AM

Post# of 793666

No one should have the perception that will ever get $1 out of FnF while they remain undercapitalized

, I posted on this comment explaining the statutory provisions that restrict this payment of Securities Litigation judgment with all detail, as part of was called on Sunday "epitome of corruption":

"Lamberth rebate" is fraud in every aspect you can think of. From an illegal Class Action with the absence of the FNMA holders, the fiction of "implied contract", disregard of the laws, phony economic harm, etc. and epitome of corruption, as the payment of Securities Litigation judgments sought, is restricted in the same statutory provision that they've covered up from the onset, that also bars the dividends and today's gifted SPS, and whose exceptions are the grounds of the Separate Account plan:
-Reduce the SPS: U.S. Code §4614(e)
-Recapitalization: CFR 1237.12


Yet, Navy Hedge Fund, following orders, complains about:

Inspector General makes ZERO mention of the UNANIMOUS

8-0 JURY TRIAL Verdict AGAINST the FHFA & TREASURY !


Unaware that it was the very FHFA that requested to defer entering Judgment because the payment sought is restricted. Though it was an oral motion, so the reason isn't made public, which confirms the obscurantism of this Federal Agency in all its actions, evidence in itself of the Separate Account plan.

A verdict without a judge's judgment or court order, is worthless. Primarily, because the judge can enter a "judgment notwithstanding the verdict" (JNOV), in favor of the Defendant.
Let me be more clear. No one can even opine about the verdict until the day it takes effect with the judgment.
Once again, navy showing lack of understanding of FnF matters.
Playing the fool is not an option (coverups, twists, etc.). It's fraud (lying for profit)