Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

Haha.....when you put it that way, I guess I can understand. It's truly amazing how this couple handful of beliebers latched onto this idea that the 2 things are closely connected in terms of winning or losing patent infringement cases, no matter how many times and ways it's explained to them.

A few days ago, I was a bit frustrated about that and no one ever has stepped up to present a legal logical reason or reasons why positive IPR outcomes would serve to help a judge rule on infringement. So I decided to do my own search and I used every plausible applicable set of search terms and guess what?.............i could not find a single instance anywhere that identified positive IPR outcomes (for the patent owner) as an influence or deciding factor in any way shape or form. I searched for at least an hour if not more. I was begging the internet to agree with what these "experts" here keep saying over and over for years. I could not find any such agreement. Not that I was surprised... There was a few mentions of the IPRs in conjunction with an infringement trial but it was nothing to do with winning or losing IPR decisions. It was to do with something else but I forget at the moment what it was. In any event, I think I saved some if not all of my findings. I might post it.