Every lawyer that vplm has had and there have been many, have been called super lawyers...either by themselves, their peers or peeps on this board. All of them, going back to Smart and Biggar and all the rest. There's been an army but after all these yrs, the only benefactors have been the insiders.
If Hudnell's win rate is so high then why didn't you post said win rate?
The IPR decisions, as I've correctly described, were never wins per se, as nothing was gained. They were successful defenses of challenges. After the decisions, nothing was gained or lost. Everything was the same as it was before the IPRs and as it was the day ea patent was granted. That is an undeniable fact. It's not a bad thing but nothing was gained. The only way you can see them as wins... Is if you did not believe, as it seemed EVERYONE HERE DID AT THE TIME, that the USPTO was fully qualified and did one hell of a job procecuting the applications. So many times it has been said on this board that those uspto patent examiners were THE best and most knowledgeable patent ppl there were. Such a big deal was made of that here on this board. Maybe look THAT up and maybe answer it directly instead of steering around it, ignoring it. Such a big shmeal is made of the now 28 IPR favorable decisions, something as far as I know, no one has ever come close to having that......and yet 28 IPRs has never produced any favorable infringement decisions after all these many yrs. I mean one might think that with such a super lawyer and all the other super lawyers and 28 IPRs that would've equated to some real trial wins after all these years, maybe you see that as an unreasonable expectation. Oh, and that's not even to mention the super favorable judge in Waco that is super fair and quick and runs such a tight ship and does T put up with any baloney in his court. Yet, still nothing for vplm shareholders. Day after day week after week month after month year after year and now decade after decade, all we get is alot of insider selling off at unreal rates, an ever falling pps, now down in the penny range again, and the constant mantras of patience is a virtue and best position ever. And daily price manipulation. And lies about settlements (nothing new there. They been doing that for 10 yrs or so).
Saying everything and everybody is so great is pollyannish, considering no solid results and a bunch of dismissed cases with zero for shareholders. Oh, but you DID give almost honorable mention to the poor optics of the massive insider selloff. Let's see, how did you characterize that?..........oh yeah..... "a little unethical"...lololol... I didn't realize that being unethical was a little thing...
How about calling a spade, a spade. Emu and company were found guilty of deriliction of duty and unjust personal enrichment...i know, I know... that was really a good thing or just bs, right?
And I forgot to mention youth still don't understand what patent validity means...
You mention it as some great attribute but that's incorrect. All patents are valid. There's no such thing as an invalid patent. If it's invalid, it's not a patent. And there's no greater or lesser degree of validity. It's either valid or it's not a patent. A few of you don't seem to be able to get the concept. The day a patent is born jts valid and it's away valid unless and until something happens to invalidate it at which point it's no longer a patent. So I laugh when validity is brought up as somehow making the patent stronger. It's strength and validity are exactly the same as the moment of patenthood. Nothing more nothing less due to the great and unmatched knowledge of patents of the uspto.
You laughing at the possibility of scam shows you have no knowledge of the many otc pennystocks with respected lawyers and ceos, around for a long time, and with allegedly good patents or products, who have gone bk or busted by sec or just go on ripping shareholders to one degree or another for decades in some cases. Or that the Emu, with some of his past very questionable business behavior, could be capable of scaminess. That's not what a jury of his peers thought.
You mentioned enforcement of the patents. There has never been any enforcement since they were created. There may be nothing to enforce. Just a front. A shell game. A Bernie madoff special.
All my commentary is to be considered as my personal opinions, to which I am entitled. And there is no proof of said opinions unless I offer it in the comments.
