InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 3128
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 11/09/2006

Re: None

Friday, 09/22/2023 5:33:32 PM

Friday, September 22, 2023 5:33:32 PM

Post# of 18314
While we are all beating the bushes in different message thread it seem possibly Intel did indeed Infringe but how could HDC prove any damages unless we had sales or licensing with those very same patents prior. Did ever (aside from NEO) ever figure out from prior licensing experience what damages might parallel to determine this? I'm sure I'm all wet but just trying to touch on possible problems that were missed in the damage report that our Attorneys could not prove but I'm finding hard to believe our attorney's didn't already have this prepared I mean for them to walk or submit a infringing report without damages would have been suicide. I also believe even if actually especially if Intel was in a bind with what HDC submitted that Intel surely would have replied on the future October 6 rebuttal date. I'm now wondering if something happened at the Federal level where the USPTO, HDC and Intel agreed to back away from this case