InvestorsHub Logo

nyt

Followers 26
Posts 12939
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2011

nyt

Re: prophet2 post# 124039

Tuesday, 09/19/2023 6:04:22 PM

Tuesday, September 19, 2023 6:04:22 PM

Post# of 132821
Wow. I find your post bizarre. You feel like you have to apologize for an otherwise honest, heartfelt, well laid out, covering of a good many bases. It was as if you think that this msg board is only here for those whose sentiment is positive and only post positive thoughts and observations despite anything that might legitimately exist to the contrary. Ridiculous...Pollyanna is usually discarded after kindergarten.

You obviously have reached your conclusions, which I think you nailed every nail squarely on the head, and yet....what?....you feel like you have to bow down and apologize to the peeps on the board (fewer and fewer everyday, in light of and because of the points you made above, who see it completely different than you) whom are not just in total opposition, but whom show less than zero respect for opposing opinions and who daily ridicule and belittle, deride, namecall and berate those who are not or no longer pro vplm? I agreed with all you said, even tho my main reasons for being negative on vplm is because I don't believe in the patents viability nor in the infringements for the reasons I've laid out many times, but I felt your bold post was somewhat less legitimized by feeling you had to apologize for the intelligent and perceptive conclusions you reached. Oh I guess you must feel somewhat caught between the proverbial rock and a hard place and felt an apology was the right thing to do, but I saw it as taking away from an otherwise courageous post.

All my commentary is to be considered as my personal opinions, to which I am entitled. And there is no proof of said opinions unless I offer it in the comments.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News