InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 2176
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/15/2019

Re: Gee4030 post# 20606

Wednesday, 09/13/2023 11:30:33 AM

Wednesday, September 13, 2023 11:30:33 AM

Post# of 21238
I respect your opinion. I am just taking a more cautious approach...thirsting for more information before matching the rocket ship emoji's, and the timeline, seen on other social media platforms. I too think it is inevitable, in years, but what will it look like is the question. Rest assured, if the govt is involved, in the end, it probably wont look anything like the industry that we know today. I have my list of questions/concerns...and then a lot of me wonders if the DEA will use this opportunity to 'have their cake and eat it too'...and treat it like Opium; keep raw formats: flower, extracts and resin at schedule I, and add/schedule derivative formats at lower levels; cater to the pharmaceutical industry. Consider me a 'tinfoil hat' type on this situation. I see it as a baby step forward...but what's the catch? There is obviously a reason they want it scheduled...if not, the easiest solution would be for the govt should just deschedule it and leave the decision to the states (impost an excise tax and call it a day). I can also see, if rescheduled, and federal 280E removed, that states might do two things: (1) new states might now have cover for not wanting to move medical, or AU, because the govt just put the industry in the hands of prescription medications...let the doctors decide what is best for people/patients (state tax revenue being the obvious defense for this not happening). Or, more likely, (2) states see 280E federal tax removed and they quickly impose an excise tax because they too are aware of the new found revenue coming to these operators. Anyway...long story to say that I'll be curious to see what happens...and speculating all the way until there is an answer.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SHWZ News