Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

Alot to chew on there. More than I bargained for I think, but I'll see what I can digest. One thing I noticed in the 10k was that excerpt I posted earlier, apparently WAS copied from a filing rather than a PR, as it looks like an exact copy of what I posted, but I remember you said the data reported is often just BS that winds up sliding, so what's the point, if you can't believe anything contained therein?

I'll try to extract what may explain my confusion about fiduciary. So far I understand you don't mean in a moral sense but in some legal sense. So far I think it's due to technical reasons... I doubt there's too many shareholders of any stock on any sort of exchange, regardless if technically called a market or not, who aren't pretty certain that the company they buy stock from doesn't have any fiduciary duty, but if it's true that they (the company) does not have said duty due to highly technical rules language, then I guess the recent lawsuit supposedly filed by shareholders, against vplm, is a moot exercise in futility (if even real to begin with, as it could not be found anywhere on the net, aside from some subscription only Bloomberg site, so who knows?

However, are you aware of a couple years old lawsuit against vplm by Locksmith financial, in a civil suit, Malak and the rest of the then current BOD, was found guilty of breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment?