InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 3000
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/25/2020

Re: LuLeVan post# 767451

Tuesday, 09/12/2023 1:51:13 AM

Tuesday, September 12, 2023 1:51:13 AM

Post# of 796426
Bradford = LuLeVan = The Man With No Name.
Obsessed with disregarding the law and harass the common stocks.
There won't be a resolution that changes the actions that have been taken.
A 10% dividend is as legal as a NWS dividend (subsection (g) unlimited yield on SPS), the fastest speed for the Separate Account plan, as it stopped the death spiral (the 10% dividend prompted capital deficiency)
It was not an actual dividend if it's restricted (like today's gifted SPS) and unavailable funds for distribution as dividend, out of a Retained Earnings account with Accumulated Deficit all along.
The FHFA-C's Incidental Power allows it to lie and send assessments with capital distributions under the guise of dividends, applied towards the exceptions of this restriction in the law + CFR1237.12.

Any resolution aims to uphold every single action by the FHFA and UST, not to change the past: "What if the NWS dividend had't existed? The SPS would have been repaid,..." and so on and so forth.

Bradford is another guy that uses multiple ID's, like the pro se plaintiff and navy cmdr.