InvestorsHub Logo

nyt

Followers 26
Posts 13002
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2011

nyt

Re: None

Monday, 09/11/2023 12:59:32 PM

Monday, September 11, 2023 12:59:32 PM

Post# of 133274
No one with a true legal understanding of IPR decisions, ever calls them IPR "wins" because they know the simple FACT that they are not wins at all. They are nothing more than successfully defending against claims of non validity. It's just a cheap and easy way for the defendants to try throwing shit against the wall hoping some will stick. They pick one of the claims made in the patents, one of the claims THAT ALREADY HAS BEEN CAREFULLY EXAMINED BEFORE BY THE USPTO EXAMINERS........... WHO........ ACCORDING TO MANY HERE, AS CAN EASILY BE LOOKED UP AND FOUND...........WHO OFTEN TOLD US HOW THE USPTO EXAMINERS ARE THE BEST AND BY FAR, MOST EXPERT AND KNOWLEDGEABLE ppl there are and how they leave no stone unturned in their investigation and procecution of ea and every patent! Yeah, they FORGET so easily what they said here, that is, when it's most convenient to forget or remember to support the agenda. So vplm gets up there and defends the challenges made against the patents. But the little secret that isn't so secret is that the patents and all their claims were thoroughly examined and deemed VALID already. That's why they are patents in the 1st place! So when the judge rules in their favor, they HAVE NOT WON A THING! THEY HAVE SIMPLY DEFENDED THE FACT THAT THE PATENT AND WHATEVER WAS CHALLENGED, WAS ALREADY FOUND TO BE VALID BEFORE the challenge was made. And the funny and ironic thing of it is.............that ever since sawyer threatened the ALREADY ESTABLISHED TO BE CORRUPT, PTAB, WITH FEDERAL RICO CHARGES........... EACH AND EVERY IPR HAS BEEN RULED IN FAVOR OF VPLM lololololol.

That's why no one has stepped fwd to meet my challenge that no lawyer would call them "wins" when they are nothing more than defended challenges. After the positive ruling, NOTHING HAS BEEN GAINED OR LOST. SAME VALID PATENT IT ALWAYS WAS FROM DAY ONE.

Or my challenge that no one can show any evidence that a judge has noted IPR "wins" in ANY ruling made!

Show me.....

All my commentary is to be considered as my personal opinions, to which I am entitled. And there is no proof of said opinions unless I offer it in the comments.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News