InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 358
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/26/2023

Re: bradford86 post# 767409

Monday, 09/11/2023 10:16:08 AM

Monday, September 11, 2023 10:16:08 AM

Post# of 798277
IMO - #1 perpetuates the fraud, the SPS gets paid twice because the language was never intended for release. Option #2 ends the fraud by rectifying the "impossible to repay" language in the contracts. (They should also remove the NWS language but probably won't)

Option #2 has the potential for everyone to have some but not all of the win - Treasury, FHFA, shareholders.