InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 3000
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/25/2020

Re: Robert from yahoo bd post# 767361

Monday, 09/11/2023 12:43:54 AM

Monday, September 11, 2023 12:43:54 AM

Post# of 796422
It's the opposite: complaint for not being expropriated in 2012, when the Argentinean government acquired only a 51% stake.
The case is a breach of the YPF statutes that required a Takings/tender offer for the entire company when someone holds a 51% stake.
The relief is, thus, the full Taking of the remaining stake at the same terms as the initial 51% stake.
This has nothing to do with FnF in a Conservatorship, where they have repaid the obligation SPS and recapitalized through a Separate Account, according to the law and Finance, similar to the 1989 bailout of the FHLBanks, as I already told you, here.
Neither the Conservatorship nor the Charter Act, allow a Nationalization by taking the profits away, as the SCOTUS made clear with "the rehabilitation of FnF" endgame, which is the restoration to a sound and solvent condition (capital levels Basel framework and reduce the obligations with the taxpayer, respectively)
The Conservatorship terminates with FnF resuming independent operations.
If there is a Takings today at the stocks' adjusted fair value, it will be considered hostile.