Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Wise Man]

That statement from Trump goes against the plaintiffs, because the SCOTUS required a statement "expressing displeasure with actions taken by a Director and...asserted that he would remove the Director if the statute didn't stand in the way".
Because it was a constitutional claim abou the "for cause" removal restriction declared unconstitutional (It's consitutional by the way, in congressionally chartered private corporations: LIMITED POWERS)
But Trump does exactly the opposite:

We are doing well with them. Now, it's well managed.They are great people....They have some really good people running it.

Nice going, pro se plaintiff!