Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

The patents are bogus.

The patents are worthless.

One of the other or both is true imo.

Someone said that much has been done to show the patents are all that. (do I really have to explain what "all that" means every time I say it?). I disagree and challenge to show any direct evidence of same. Not some inferred but indirect conclusion, like "oh, there's microwave background radiation out there so that proves the big bang", but any shred of DIRECT evidence of infringement. Not inferred, DIRECT! I contend there is not a shred of any such direct, empirical evidence. So that does not, by any stretch, prove the patents are bogus, but they could be. I think they are bogus by indirect inference, ie, something has or hasn't happened, therefore I conclude... But.....in also find that what has or hasn't happened.......to be VERY VERY strong evidence, so I believe. I acknowledge not having proof. And just because a trial hasn't concluded anything yet, doesn't minimize my reasoning, beliefs and conclusions. Most all my predictions here for near 13 yrs have been correct.

* I didn't finish this...

The 2nd part is "worthless"

As far as I'm concerned, they have had near 20 yrs to show they have value and in that time have not made a dime. Some might say, "but they have, as all the other companies use them", but I maintain there's no proof of that so I say they are worthless. That could change in the future but I doubt it.