Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[InvestorinAZ]

Yes, you're right. The owners WOULD have done so... if they could have.
That's why they had to go to trial. (duh)
So far, I think our team has done a bangup job of proving infringement,
which is why I see the glass as MORE than half full as they continue to close off all of their escape routes.

But for VPLM, the ONLY way they're going to get any revenues from these patents is going to be FORCED thru the courts.
So, until the trials are over, or a settlement is reached, your argument about "revenues" is moot.

Jumping up and down, and standing on your head, and screaming BUT REVENUES!!!! doesn't mean anything.

Bottom line... we BOTH have to wait to see what the court says (or what settlements come).

In the case of vplm, the patents were created close to 20 yrs ago and I'm sure if there was any way for any of them to do what they allegedly do and there was a buyer or any other way to convert to revenue, the owners would have done so...unless the the payment offered was simply too small. In any event, in the case of vplm patents, never been any revenue generated and THAT, above, is the criteria, the hallmark.. Nothing there, so the given requirement, has not been met........for a very very long time. As to what they do, there is no known proof of that. In fact, there is no known anything not even an indicator. (Hmmmm....maybe THATS why vplm promised to fold the tech into their alleged voip service provider platform........but then DIDNT). Only vplm saying they were tested but to my knowledge the test results have never been made available. Thus, both above criteria have not been met in any way, shape or form.

You can jump up and down and stand on your head, swearing the patents can do this, that and the other, but I am handling it as in a court of law. No proofee, no infringee.