Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

Explain it until you're blue in the face and the cows come home and you'll STILL BE WRONG and not be able to offer a shred of undeniable proof of your so called layers. The truth simply is that a positive outcome for an IPR adds no layers of anything else that the patent did not have the day it was born. Prove or show different. You can't because it doesn't exist except in your mind. Show me a single instance where a voip patent lawyer or a judge states that a positive IPR gives ANYTHING additional to a patent that it didn't already possess. Never happen cuz it doesn't. All in your mind.. Show me legally. Give a real world example. The only thing it does.......is prevent the bad that would be IF vplm lost an IPR. THAT WOULD BE DIFFERENT BECAUSE IT WOULD NO LONGER BE A PATENT.

Layers of what? What is in the layer that wasn't there before?????