Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

Again, it's not important enough to be an issue, but it's you that isn't following the narrative and in already told you b4, that I don't know what your "VI" refers to and I never said it has anything to do with vplm, per se, but I did remind you of the posts you made that prompted me to mention the 3rd possibility which is zero movement. I don't know what it is that you don't get, but it couldnt be any simpler. Without me reposting the quotes from those posts, basically you made light of a vplm poster who predicted the price would go up or down, because that's obviously not much of a prediction. So after you made your remark, I jumped in to light-heartedly make the point that there's always the possibility of zero movement. To which you replied, trying to tell me you were talking about something else, and something about AMC, etc. But that's not the case. If you go back to the original post, it's very obvious that you made fun of the other guys loose prediction and I told you there was the 3rd possibility. I have no idea what makes you think something THAT simple is not the narrative. It's not important but if you want me to post the quote AGAIN, ok. I guarantee you were talking about vplm at the time, because that's what he was referring to. And even if you thought you were talking about some other stock, it's STILL true that there are 3 possibles, not 2. I'm fine with leaving it alone now unless you want to press it.