Biotech Values

[vinmantoo]

Not gonna debate. You have your references & I have mine, which are based on publications, MD podcasts and conference webcasts, plus recent correspondence with leading researchers by an MD I know very well. As much as I don't want to sound like a self-important internet blowhard, I will have to because I don't want to reveal personal info here.

Why are you getting so defensive? I provided links to two recent publications on the topics of durability of protection generated by vaccination and by previous infection. You didn't provide any links to any published studies. If you have some links to such studies then please provide them. More information is better. Why in the world would you have to reveal personal data to provide links to published data or to podcasts?

Not enough data so far in any case for anyone to make broad, definitive conclusions; we're getting updates in real-time from a massive, poorly-documented trial.

What?? You previously said the following;

The data (such as it is) points to two months of really strong immunity following recovery, the following two months decent, then a steady decline out to perhaps 8-9 mos, but definstely not really good immunity for that entire period.

That was in https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172751872. Why is it that you made broad definitive conclusions with no links but after I provided links to recently published studies that came to different conclusions that you stated there suddenly isn't enough data to make definitive conclusions?

As new Covid variants arise, more data will be generated on the protective efficacy of vaccination and of previous infection with other variants. The data will no doubt change.