Tuesday, September 05, 2023 10:04:17 AM
I don't know how you can't see the double standard here. The reason is because the increase in the LP was given for no consideration. It would be like me telling you "In consideration for you keeping your annual salary, you will owe me your entire annual salary." That equates to a NWS, the GSEs giving all of their profit away. Perhaps not for cash now, but for LP. If the NWS doesn't work for cash, how is it supposed to remain viable for future LP redemption? Delaying when you collect doesn't make it any more legitimate.
Returning/reducing the LP is NOT for nothing. It is to correct an action that the courts have recognized as a breach of good faith and fair dealing. Throwing hundreds of billions of dollars in value in the trash can is exactly how this whole thing started.
"No specific law was cited in Calabria's book, but that doesn't mean Treasury didn't have a specific one in mind."
There is no such law. And even if there were, there are millions of contracts that start with "In consideration for $1..." or fill in the blank.. We retire the SPS.
FEATURED North Bay Resources Announces Assays up to 9.5% Copper at Murex Copper Project, British Columbia • Nov 4, 2024 9:00 AM
Rainmaker Worldwide Inc. Announces Strategic Partnership Between Miranda Water Technologies and Fleming College • RAKR • Nov 4, 2024 12:03 PM
Rainmaker Worldwide Inc. to Assume Direct, Non-Dealer Sales of Miranda Water Technologies in U.S. and Mexico in First Quarter of 2025 • RAKR • Nov 4, 2024 8:31 AM
CBD Life Sciences Inc. (CBDL) Launches High-Demand Mushroom Gummy Line for Targeted Wellness Needs, Tapping into a Booming $20 Billion Market • CBDL • Oct 31, 2024 8:00 AM
Nerds On Site Announces Q1 Growth and New Initiatives for the Remainder of 2024 • NOSUF • Oct 31, 2024 7:01 AM
Innovation Beverage Group Receives Largest Shipment of its Top-Selling Bitters to Date in the U.S.-Ready to Meet Growing Demand from Expanding Distribution Network • IBG • Oct 30, 2024 12:22 PM