InvestorsHub Logo

nyt

Followers 25
Posts 12693
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2011

nyt

Re: DesktopDR post# 123087

Friday, 09/01/2023 3:17:04 PM

Friday, September 01, 2023 3:17:04 PM

Post# of 130793
Hard to believe you could say and believe these things......at this stage of the game...
For ex: "we all need to be patient"......lol, I honestly didn't think anyone was still willing and able to use that phrase anymore without being too embarrassed. I mean COME ON..... how many freakin yrs can such an ultra over used thing make any sense? Company been around for 23 yrs but if you only want to count the VOIP involvement yrs, well guess what?.......my deep research has shown me that the voice over internet protocol involvement goes almost back to the beginning and I have documentation of same. Most ppl think vplm only got involved in voip 10 or 12 yrs ago. Not so. That being said, let's say you only want to count this patent play era, in your "must have patience" mentality. Ok, fair enough. So that began at least 12 to 13 yrs ago, ie, 2011 or maybe 2010. Most likely, the collaborations between vplm and Digi began even before then as the emu has personally stated that they both go way back as friends. But I'll go with let's say 12 or 13 yrs. If you're trying to convince me that 12 or 23 yrs is not enough time to get there, well then please tell me if another patent play.........hang on now, not just ANY patent play.....but one that has professed from the git, to having the absolute basis and foundational patents necessary to the use and proliferation of voip itself, which conversely, has done quite well on its own for may yrs regardless of vplm and long before vplm. As well, they claim directly and indirectly to be worth many tens of billions of dollars. That being the case, don't give any examples of some obscure patent play that doesn't claim to have such a far reaching importance. Don't forget hey have also stated that any and all service providers of voip, worldwide, ARE INFRINGERS....... AUTOMATIC! That's right, the emu has stated same. So give me an example of any patent play ever, that even comes close to such claims.......and could not make a dime or sell a licence or get a partnership or get a settlement or sell the company FOR 12 YRS OF ALLEGEDLY TRYING!
I would love to hear of such a company. I don't think it exists.

The underlying and overarching TRUTH OF THE MATTER IS........

NO COMPANY IN HISTORY OR EVER WILL BE.........WOULD ALLOW SUCH ALMOST PRICELESS AND POWER EMBEDDED (the top worldwide communication vehicle) TREASURE CHEST TO SIT THERE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD, UNBOUGHT, UNLICENCED, UNSETTLED.........FOR ALL THIS TIME AAAAAAND ALLOW ANY OF THEIR COMPETITORS TO STEP UP AND GET FROGGY AND PULL THE RUG OUT FROM UNDER THEM BY PURCHASING VOLM. THAT IS 1000% AGAINST HUMAN NATURE, BUSINESS NATURE AND BASIC SIMPLE COMMON SENSE. IT HAS NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE ON ANY SCALE WORTH MENTIONING AND NEVER WILL. THERE ARE MANY MANY VOIP SERVICE PROVIDERS OUT THERE, MANY MORE THAN THE MERE 60 MENTIONED BY NAME BY VPLM (and almost immediately those names were removed from their website long ago) AND THEY CAN'T ALL BE CROOKS WHO STOLE VPLM PATENTS AND THEY CANT ALL BE THST DUMB AS TOO LEAVE VPLM SITTING IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD AND LOSE OUT ON SLL THAT FUTURE WEALTH AND POWER.

yes, that's a period at the end. and above IS critical thinking.

All my commentary is to be considered as my personal opinions, to which I am entitled. And there is no proof of said opinions unless I offer it in the comments.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News