Fannie Mae (FNMA)

[Patswil]

. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Court should deny an award of prejudgment interest to the Fannie Preferred Class. Alternatively, if the Court determines in its discretion that prejudgment interest for the Fannie Preferred Class is warranted, the Court should award simple interest at a Case 1:13-mc-01288-RCL Document 395 Filed 08/15/23 Page 20 of 21
p. 21

13 rate of 5% above the Federal Reserve discount rate that existed at the time the Court determines interest began to accrue. Dated: August 15, 2023 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Asim Varma Asim Varma (D.C. Bar # 426364) Jonathan L. Stern (D.C. Bar # 375713) David B. Bergman (D.C. Bar # 435392) Ian S. Hoffman (D.C. Bar # 983419) R. Stanton Jones (D.C. Bar # 987088) ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP 601 Massachusetts Ave. NW Washington, DC 20001 Tel.: [phone] Fax: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant Federal Housing Finance Agency /s/ Michael J. Ciatti Michael J. Ciatti (D.C. Bar #467177) KING & SPALDING LLP 1700 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20006 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] [e-mail] Attorney for the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. /s/ Meaghan VerGow Meaghan VerGow (D.C. Bar # 977165) O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 1625 Eye St. NW Washington, DC 20006 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] mvergow @Bluejay62-RCL Doc
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23909994-113-mc-01288-doc-395