InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 8898
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/01/2013

Re: HokieHead post# 139968

Monday, 07/31/2023 10:02:25 AM

Monday, July 31, 2023 10:02:25 AM

Post# of 172024
GVSI had previously applied to the SEC/FINRA for a change in corporate actions:

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-19407-event-1.pdf

FINRA's denial under Rule 6490 of the Company's requested corporate actions of a change of corporate name, symbol request and a reverse stock exchange pursuant to a merger on a one for twenty-thousand (I :20,000) basis (the "Corporate Actions").

FINRA initially declined to process the Company's Corporate Actions on June 21, 2019 by delivering a Notice of Deficiency Pursuant to FINRA Rule 6490.



As stated in the SEC document above, the SEC declined GVSI's corporate actions. GVSI then appealed the decision on the SEC/FINRA declined corporate actions:

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-19407-2020-09-16-reply-to-finra-opposition-to-the-application-for-good-vibration-shoes.pdf

On March 20, 2019 (18 months ago), Applicant, Allied Corp. (previously Good
Vibration Shoes, Inc.) ("GVSI"), submitted an application to FINRA to complete a name change, obtain a new symbol, and conduct a reverse stock exchange pursuant to a merger, pursuant to FINRA Rule 6490. After months and months of delays, FINRA determined the application was deficient on June 21, 2019. Applicant filed an appeal to the Uniform Practice Committee of FINRA (the “Committee”) on June 27, 2019. On August 16, 2019...the Committee affirmed FINRA’s determination.



The SEC/FINRA affirmed declining the change in GVSI's corporate actions so GVSI withdrew the appeal on the restriction so the SEC/FINRA dismissed the case which means the restriction on corporate actions are still in place.



So Sharp is basically admitting that getting GVSI's corporate actions approved by the SEC/FINRA is "UNWINNABLE."

If the SEC/FINRA administrative proceeding was "UNWINNABLE" then whatever "agreement" that was reached was not in GVSI's favor.

There's a reason why Sharp isn't bragging (as he usually does) about the "agreement." The "agreement" most likely was that GVSI can't file future corporate actions with the SEC/FINRA.

The SEC doesn't open an administrative proceeding because a company is in violation of FINRA Rule 6490, just like it doesn't open an administrative proceeding when a stock becomes delinquent. It simply won't approve any corporate actions such as a corpote name change, ticker symbol change or reverse merger. This is the reality GVSI currently finds itself in.

Nobody is denying that the SEC/FINRA administrative proceeding for GVSI's appeal of the restriction on its corporate actions was dismissed. But trying to spin the "agreement" as GVSI being able to do whatever it wants with the SEC/FINRA after withdrawing the appeal on the SEC restricting its corporate actions which is actually capitulating and losing the case is false information. GVSI's withdrawl of the appeal is basically saying that getting the SEC/FINRA to approve a change in its corporate actions such as a reverse merger was "UNWINNABLE."

Especially since GVSI is SEC delinquent, is not SEC registered, is not SEC reporting, is in violation of FINRA Rule 6490 and Sharp already said he ABANDONED getting GVSI audited which is an SEC requirement to get registered.





Notice I'm using verifiable links to SEC documents and Sharp's own tweets. Sharp supporters offer no links other than the SEC document showing that GVSI withdrew it's appeal which they falsely say that it means GVSI somehow won because the withdrawl of the appeal and dismissal means there are no further issues with the SEC/FINRA which is false information. The SEC/FINRA restriction on corporate actions such as a reverse merger is still in place and so is FINRA's Notice of Deficiency.
Bearish
Bearish

GVSI is delinquent with the SEC, is not SEC registered and reporting, has a FINRA Notice of Deficiency that was never addressed, has a SEC/FINRA restriction on its corporate actions such as a reverse merger and is in violation of FINRA Rule 6490.