Tautachrome Inc (TTCM)

[Matt1963]

Re.

"The engagement of a consultant who posted about the company on social media platforms was ended. His postings failed to disclose that he was paid by the company. This practice is incompatible with the enforced transparency policies of the company going forward."

One is still left wondering why, having issued this statement to the SEC in their 8K of 07/28/23, the company failed to disclose the name of the hired "consultant" they employed as their social media posting promoter, receiving monetary compensation from the business (i.e. Shareholder funds), for his services.

If they wanted to protect him from the possibility of a knock on the door from the Feds, surely they could have given his name and business contact, rather than leaving it that "his postings failed to disclose" (thus defacto admitting he was an undisclosed poster/promoter paid by the company). TTCM's ex-management owes it to him to protect him and imv, they failed to do so by not naming him, whilst in the process, could well have implicated other innocent parties.

So, let's at least give the guy a chance to defend himself, after all, what's to hide?

Let me help him out because, as a "consultant" Vance Tallman (last of Panama) will no doubt have a business entity with records of any and every company he's dealt with in the past, including TTCM, together with an Objects Clause (or equivalent) detailing his business activities and will be able to provide his statements of accounts and his tax filings. Production of those documents will allow him to defend the company's accusations against him for failing to disclose in his postings that the company was paying him to write the posts.

Hope my suggestions are helpful.