Your feeling is as valid as anyone else's feeling.
You could be right, that he is laughing aaaaaaaaall the way to the bank, with your money in his pocket and you are never going to see it again. You might as well liquidate your position for the tax loss.
The only argument against that that I can think of is his new transfer agent for NRG. On (internet webpage) paper, she appears to hate OTC fraudsters and is more than happy to expose them.
Unless she is undercover working to expose Nixon [and if he reads this ihub forum, now he's on alert], it seems likely (to me) that something positive will happen for shareholders. But that's only a conclusion based on this sort of public information.
It's just as valid to say that the only public information that matters is that WCVC is revoked, and odds are heavily stacked against revoked stocks from returning to trading. A few of them do, but most of them do not.
[Closing note: I've been told privately that it can be a strategy for CEOs of revoked stocks to wait long enough to exasperate retail shareholders into liquidating, to take retail shares out of play for the future time when the stock comes back to life. That, however, is speculative for WCVC.]
