InvestorsHub Logo

nyt

Followers 26
Posts 13028
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2011

nyt

Re: None

Saturday, 07/08/2023 9:05:52 PM

Saturday, July 08, 2023 9:05:52 PM

Post# of 133394
For those who don't understand the simple question, it has nothing to do with whether or not it's a buyout of the entire company, a purchase of the patents alone, or any if the other possibke options vplm alleged it's looking to have happen.

It's an extremely simple question. I decided the last time I asked it to acknowledge that it's not just a buy the patents choice and has various options. I didn't wish the question to be yes or no between those various options. Ea and every time the question was asked b4, it was simply yes or no to buy or not buy. But that time I just decided to acknowledge there were other options. However, the question is still the same. And I even took the time to explain exactly why the question was being asked and why it was very pertinent and very important.

That said, good time to note that years ago when shareholders decided it was just fine to be blatantly lied to by the company, making them their "marks", and let the company slide totally on that, and now accepted that the company/patents were for sale....well the whole tenor of discussions here was THAT.....meaning sale of patents/company....was the road we were put on. It was the newly accepted way to go (especially as Chang and the rest of the BOD were blatantly slewing anything and everything to convince the new marks that there was all sorts of "beating the doors down" to buy these patents and that it would be quickly forthcoming PLUS millions of dollars in immed royalties to be coming. So the marks, including myself, bought and bought and bought as the price went up and up and up, as well as garnering new shareholders and tons of shares being bought up.

Well, myself and a couple other ppl suggested that a plan B would be a much better thing in the long run, ie, licencing and other firms if partnering. That suggestion was immediately and summarily beat down as NOT AN OPTION AND STUPID. It's right there in the archives. Point being that now after all these years of not being able to earn a plugged nickel or sell any patents, so now the goalposts have so amusingly moved from oh, we'll take $25/$20/$15/$10/$5.....to now commonly heard a Dollar, 50 cents, and now 30 cents and even 20 cents or shares or partners or ANYTHING above and beyond trips.

The fact remains that the main goal in the minds of almost all.....is to sell the patents/company and get a good price making the 10 yrs agony worth it. This is undeniable imho.

Thus........the question remains as intelligent and important as ever......oh and I fully get those who are reluctant to give an honest and open minded answer......

IF YOU HAD THE CASH, WOULD YOU BUY THE PATENTS/COMPANY???



itsthemostimportantquestionasked

All my commentary is to be considered as my personal opinions, to which I am entitled. And there is no proof of said opinions unless I offer it in the comments.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News