The Question and Answer Board

[JerryCampbell]

It sounds like the board(s) you post on involve much nicer folks than the NWBO board. Dialog and actual arguments would be a huge improvement.

Let's say a person questions the preferred bullish narrative. If the bulls can't refute the content, they attack the messenger. I've been attacked for quoting the company's own SEC filings and PRs.

This nasty attack attitude also applies to any oncologist who questions the published results. People who have no medical background whatsoever think nothing of claiming actual surgeons are conflicted just because they disagree with something favorable to NWBO.

There needs to be a means to impose civility where it is lacking. Removing the uncivil from ihub would improve the overall experience because they just add noise rather than contribute anything of value. Same logic as bars having bouncers to remove problematic drunks.