InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 176
Posts 16290
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/10/2008

Re: None

Tuesday, 06/06/2023 3:06:57 PM

Tuesday, June 06, 2023 3:06:57 PM

Post# of 22035
I do try and stay abreast of what I feel are trade indicators. It is not about being negative or positive, just a matter of how I see it at that time....just like now. Digesting the trade action most recently, I was convinced at first that dilution was the only means of removing dilutive debt. Issue the shares and then let the lender sell at will to recover the debt and/or make a profit.

Then, as it continued, I began to think that there was a need for operational cash for the purpose of a possible (manufacturing) acquisition.

Either of those actions could be considered a positive factor if results improve the bottom line of operations. Considering the magnitude of patent approvals, contract negotiations and the diversity of application of their 'products' could potentially result in substantial revenue generation. At that time, the pps was considered to be primed for an uphill trend line.

As the dilution continued though, talk of an R/S raised its dirty head. While not necessarily a bad thing either,if the post pricing could be retained and even advanced - although SH leverage would be dramatically reduced in regard to trading volume and speed potential of further pps rises. This is coupled with the thought that the use or need for the dilution is no longer as clear cut. Dilution became 'daily' and still does not appear to be ending - a long way to go to 10B?

Puts the concept of 'acquisition' and 'eliminating dilutive debt' to question. It also raises the question of how can so many dilutive shares be bought up so easily when a R/S is staring you in the face, no matter how low of a price you paid.

I obviously do not get it.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent GTCH News