InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 480
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/01/2019

Re: A deleted message

Saturday, 05/27/2023 12:37:32 PM

Saturday, May 27, 2023 12:37:32 PM

Post# of 13843
First, let me apologize, as I sometimes forget that my impeccable track record of being correct can cause great concern when I post things others don’t want to hear.
I now also realize, that even when I say “a feeling,” “could be wrong,” or “assumption” that most believe the statement which follows will come true, because it always does.

So let me reply point by point, then I have things to get back to:

“Trying to lower the value of the stock”
…. If this were true I would be saying -sell now before it hits 0.06. No, I am suggesting $2-3.50. That’s a massive 1275% return on investment at today’s market value. So I am actually being very positive.

“What test result were those Wave?”
…now, though many think my uncanny knowledge of UHP, Hemostyp and PMA guidelines means I must be connected somehow, it’s simply not the case.
Therefore, clearly I am speaking of past results. The current tests are still under way according to UHP documentation. So if you believe company officials then clearly I can’t know these results. I emphasized this by stating that ….UHP “testing has returned unsatisfactory results which they essentially admitted.” I thought these results were made clear to all in previous PRs. Which they were.
UHP stated “ with the laboratory leadership, believes resulted from unintended partial oxidation during the sample cutting and packaging process that was conducted by an external component supplier. ” for further info please see Appendix A.

Hopefully everyone can keep up, I know this is long. But I was called out, so it’s necessary.

Next : “ The other thing that made ZERO sense”
When one introduces a statement with “Just for weekendBBQ UEEC talking points. Hot take predictions: ” it should be assumed that these are Just for weekendBBQ UEEC talking points. Hot take predictions: hears what hot take means-“ a piece of commentary, typically produced quickly in response to a recent event, whose primary purpose is to attract attention.” So that was made clear in my intro. to the predictions.

In conclusion $2-3.50 is a glorious return and even if it is not what you want, in no way is a prediction of this size going to lower the price.

Yours truly,
Wavy.
PS. Please excuse any grammar or spelling errors (doubt it) as I don’t have time to review.
Also, someone with my track record of success and accuracy should never have to explain to this degree.

Appendix A:

Manufacturing and Packaging of our Products

The Company’s NORC products will be manufactured to our specifications and using our equipment through a contract manufacturing arrangement with an FDA certified supplier that maintains stringent quality control protocols to assure the uniformity and quality of all of our gauze products. Information on the manufacturing process and our manufacturer’s facility has been submitted as part of our PMA submission. Our gauze products are cut to size, packaged and sterilized by service providers in the United States.