DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

johnnyfiber, You sure have an interesting technique.

You respond to posts you disagree with, but you don't actually argue with them, you just post a quote with some random connection.

This latest example for instance does nothing to counter the argument presented in the initial post that there is no support for a significant valuation for the super EPO license.

I said that DNAG got it after Pfizer decided not to pursue it. You posted a quote that supports that chronology. Nothing in your quote suggests a higher valuation. What are you trying to say?

On another note, you seemed to disappear in the middle of our last conversation. Did you run out of obscure quotes, or just run and hide?

regards,
frog