InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252301
Next 10
Followers 31
Posts 464
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/08/2008

Re: rfj1862 post# 247024

Wednesday, 05/17/2023 5:47:24 PM

Wednesday, May 17, 2023 5:47:24 PM

Post# of 252301
VKTX- rfj - I agree they will not take VK2809 to ph3 in NASH by themselves irrespective of what they said on the CC. As a company they didn't exactly get the ph2b 2809 study going very quickly as it took them 3 full years just to enroll 230 participants. (They initiated 11/2019 and didn't complete till 12/2022.) While Covid had an effect, it never should have taken 3 yrs. NASH is difficult to enroll/manage trial and they clearly need help. No way they can do this and handle everything else they have on their plate.

I think it is more likely the company gets acquired whole than 2809 gets partnered. I do think your list of ABBV, NVS, and PFE is a good one to start with. One comment on Pfizer is that they are currently studying ervogastat (DGAT2 Inhibtor) with clesacostat (Acetyl CoACarboxylase Inhibitor) in an ongoing Ph 2 that has fast track status so I'm not sure if that would be a conflict. I would add that Gilead and Boehringer Ingelheim are large pharma who have tried and failed before in NASH so they probably have a strong interest in partnering or acquiring a drug that works.

My top pick for a buyout would be ABBV though- AbbVie also doesn't have much in the way of a metabolic pipeline and they have been pretty open about wanting to acquire something to replace what they are losing in Humira sales (not to mention likely losses in Botox cosmetic/therapeutics). I bet they could find 15 or 20 bill to spend on Viking. wink

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.