InvestorsHub Logo

E A

Followers 4
Posts 645
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 10/19/2021

E A

Re: None

Friday, 05/05/2023 1:33:45 PM

Friday, May 05, 2023 1:33:45 PM

Post# of 156713
There looks to be some confusion on what “LaMountain v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission” is about.

The only public information currently available is the challenge David LaMountain filed trying to block the SEC from looking as his bank records. The court declined his request February 5, 2019. The “parties” in the below quote is David LaMountain

“After a careful review of the parties' filings, the Court finds there is a demonstrable basis to believe the SEC is pursuing a legitimate investigation. The SEC is charged with investigating possible violations of U.S. securities laws and here has issued a formal order of investigation. Moreover, it is reasonable to conclude that the subpoena seeks bank records that could contain information relevant to the investigation. Petitioner's lack of a position with the company under scrutiny and his current small percentage of ownership of the same are irrelevant. The scope of the subpoena, which seeks records since January 2016, is not overbroad. See Sandsend Financial Consultants, Ltd. v. Federal Home Loan Bank Bd. , 878 F.2d 875, 877 (5th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, Petitioner's Motion for Order Pursuant to Customer Challenge (ECF No.1 ) is DENIED - So Ordered by Chief Judge William E. Smith on 2/5/2019.”

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/26578939/LaMountain_v_United_States_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission

Reminder of information posted by others a few weeks ago.