Winning Brands Corporation (WNBD)

[satter]

Perfect! So now get it, The ANALysis. Good to hear! You can offer "fair criticism" opinion without facts because opinions don't require them ( facts ). However I provided a link for you if you want them.( facts) See Below:

Confusement. Obviously. This certainly cannot be true. Giving an opinion ( "fair criticism" ) on WNBD/Eric is an expression of a belief, feeling, not factual, therefore facts are not required. If we were to accept that concept than everyone, ( yourself included ) who gives a statement of opinion on WNBD/Eric is a biased opinion or hot air at best.

However as far relevant facts they can all be found here ( except 1-z ). Upon careful review, it will show how valid the WNBD/Eric opinion was based on.

https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001114898&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0

If you find it a bit challenging to find the revelants facts, let me know, I will help.

End of discussion