Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Rodney5]

Bryndon, first off, I appreciate everything you are doing along with every other person that knows this is wrong what the FHFA / Treasury is doing to the Shareholders both Common and Preferred. In my opinion the Conservatorship should be challenged, not the Third Amendment only. Mistake of the JPS Lawyers: "This lawsuit does not challenge the foregoing arrangement made in September 2008."

Freely admit, I am not a Lawyer.

Best Regards.

Again,
The Plaintiffs brought the wrong lawsuit to the SCOTUS, Third Amendment.

I think Barron has the best approach on how to win: The Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement is not a law: The SPSPA is an illegal contract.

THE CHARTER ACT

If I am reading this wrong, please help. Thank you.

Quote: “ Bryndon is asking the court to refund the overpayment to the corporations.” End of Quote

MR. Thompson asked the same.

SCOTUS Quote:
“MR. THOMPSON: Number 1, we're seeking prospective relief so that in your hypothetical the Senate confirmed director would be enjoined from making any future sweep dividend, approving any future sweep dividend payment; and, number 2, we're asking to go back and have the overpayments, over and above the $18.9 billion, to be treated as a pay down of principal. And that would essentially deem the government paid back.

We calculate
those overpayments to be 124 billion dollars,
and each one of those overpayments was an
implementation of the Net Worth Sweep.

So, if there had not been a Net Worth
Sweep, there would be 124 billion dollars of
capital on the balance sheet today.

And if you do the math, the government's been paid back in toto plus 10 percent interest and there's 29.5 billion dollars left over.” End of Quote

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2020/19-422_3e04.pdf

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171655775