Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Rodney5]

The lawyers are focused on the third amendment net worth sweep. By Public Law the whole contract is illegal. In which case did any lawyer mention the Charter Act, the Treasury in violation of the Charter Act, and the Contract is illegal based on the United States is not permitted to charge a commitment fee to be paid by the enterprises?

Wrap your head around this!

Calculated damage?

Barron’s forthcoming Lawsuit

The Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement is not a law. The SPSPA is an illegal contract, The Charter Act is the Law.

Not paying attention:

Quote: “I am laying the groundwork for just such a claim focusing on the Charter Act and SPSA, bringing together the MQD, Separation of Powers structural violation, violations of the Charter Act, HERA, GAO act and CFO act. All of these violations by Treasury result in violations of the 14th amendment and of course the 5th amendment.” End of Quote