Worldwide NFT Inc (WNFT)

[I-Glow]

This isn't true because Calasse wasn't properly notified - which is the exact reason Sharp's application for Custodianship was rejected on two other shells - Sharp didn't provide proper notification.

So did the lower court make an error in the ruling on Calasse and did Sharp fail notification about filing for Custodianship?

If so the NVSC could send it back to District Court. Or rule it was an obvious error - someone should send the NVSC something similar to a Amicus Brief and inform the Court of 2 previous rulings that Sharp tried some subterfuge to circumvent the law on notification.

IG