PCT Ltd (PCTL)

[aandt]

It's easy to look back at all of PCT's failures (including UK) and say it's all BS, and they were making it all up. But there are too many third party facts out there supporting that PCT was engaged with the UK. Same with many other things that are now branded as total BS.

I am not defending PCT here. I have always said we need more clarity on ownership, etc. But you can't just say it's all BS. If it was all BS then how did PCT Health (the previous US name for the health division) end up in the NHS Council of Governors meeting notes? How is it that the NHS meeting notes timeline of events starting in 2019 lines up with PCT's general timeline of UK activity? That's only possible if there is truth to PCT being engaged.

It's not all BS. You can call it a lot of things and I will not argue. But the facts support that it was an active engagement.