I don’t know if Zeibell is responsible but it seems they communicate in a very defensive manner. I doubt anyone wants fluff or bs but they don’t even communicate new contracts as they happen. And we know they happen because the backlog continues to grow and the company continues to progress. They just don’t tout it. Yes we hear about the growth in backlog at the end of the quarter and that is legally sufficient — but in terms of promoting a growth company—that is the absolute minimum that can and should be done. We individual investors are not the enemy. We only want success for this company. We support them fully and appreciate their efforts. As long as they are honest they have nothing to fear from us.
Zeibell was the guy who guided the ship under old management. Because of that group’s less than capable and honest ways, in my opinion, a defensive approach was legally necessary. That is no longer the case. It’s a totally different company with different leadership. It deserves a completely different approach legally and more importantly promotionally. There is no need to look at retail as the potential enemy any longer. Promote new contracts as they happen. Be honest an up front. Support the share price with facts as they happen. Manage with confidence not fear. We are so fortunate that change came when it did. We are thankful and appreciative for our new found success. There is nothing to fear from retail shareholders. Support us as we support you. More importantly support the share price by touting “FACTS” as they happen so that no entity can come in with a lower that expected bid and potentially buy the company at lower than desirable price point. Support the share price by showing confidence and buying shares, where and when legally possible, with open market transactions. If Zeibell is responsible for this defensive approach then by all means change would be positive, in my opinion.
