Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Robert from yahoo bd]

It was NEVER raised as an issue, the Supremes were answering a question about the Seperation of Powers and the prevention of the Unitary Executive or POTUS to fire at will the head of a federal agency.

They said that the NWS was STATUTORILY PERMISSIBLE because unlike any other conservator, the FHFA could take into account, "the best interests of the FHFA and by extension the public it serves."

But the Collins decision did NOT answer the question of whether or not the Nationalization of the GSES was a political and economic question of national Importance to be decided exclusively by the peoples ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES IN CONGRESS and not Ed DeMarco, an Unelected Bureaucrat running a federal agency.

Fact is, not 1 of the 8,000 Fannie Mae shareholders have brought up the MQD issue in any of their Pleadings or Complaints have they?

Think about it Family Mang, what investment has EVER offered you Immortality?

If the current round of litigation ends up with goose eggs, you could be the lead Plaintiff in a potentially major MQD decision and the legal profession will utter, "In Family Mang, the Supreme Court said that under the MQD, Nationalization is a decision exclusively reserved for the US Congress!"

HeeeeHeeee !